ADDENDUM TO
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-02892
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM).

________________________________________________________________
_

RESUME OF CASE:

On 16 Nov 11, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to award him the AFCM.  A complete copy of the Record of 
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through 
C).

By letters, dated 23 Sep 12 and 25 Sep 12, the applicant 
requests reconsideration of his request, contending that the 
newly discovered evidence that he provides in the form of a 
Certificate of Appreciation, a media disc, a thumb drive, shows 
an intent by others that he should have been awarded the AFCM.  

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits copies of 
personal statements, a copy of a video and thumb drive 
containing information pertaining to his request, excerpts from 
his master personnel records, letters of support, excerpts from 
another officer’s master personnel records, an excerpt from the 
United States Court of Claims, a copy of an education syllabus 
and related documents, copies of photographs, copies of 
newspaper clippings and a letter from the Command Surgeon, an 
excerpt from the internet on the United States Constabulary, a 
copy of events from his Keesler assignment, a copy of Merchant 
Marine service, and a copy of a booklet on Turkey.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find 
it sufficient to change the Board’s earlier determination in 
this case.  Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence 
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to 
recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request.  

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s 
request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
02892 in Executive Session on 23 Jul 13, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

	

The following additional documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit E.	Record of Proceedings, dated 19 Jan 12, w/atchs.
	Exhibit F.	Letters, Applicant, dated 23 Sep 12 and 25 Sep 
		12, w/atchs.





                                   Panel Chair











2